vs
7.0Display5.6
7.2Performance4.8
4.3Battery4.1
5.2Memory & storage5.2
5.9Features4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto Pad 60 NeoRugKing Pad Pro
| Moto Pad 60 Neo | RugKing Pad Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 254.6 mm | 222 mm | +32.6 mm |
| Width | 166.2 mm | 131.5 mm | +34.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 12.4 mm | −5.4 mm |
| Weight | 480 g | 540 g | −60 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto Pad 60 Neo better than RugKing Pad Pro?
- 5GYes · RugKing Pad Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · RugKing Pad Pro: No
- Screen size11″ vs 8.7″+27%
- Pixel density274 ppi vs 180 ppi+52%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+33%
- Resolution (short side)1,600 px vs 800 px2×
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Resolution (long side)2,560 px vs 1,340 px+91%
- Weight480 g vs 540 g+12%
- Wired charging20 W vs 18 W+11%
- Thickness7 mm vs 12.4 mm+77%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.9% vs 73.3%+13%
Why is RugKing Pad Pro better than Moto Pad 60 Neo?
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 860 nits+72%
- eSIMNo · Moto Pad 60 Neo: Yes
- Rear camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Front camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 480 g | 540 g |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 12.4 mm |
| Height | 254.6 mm | 222 mm |
| Width | 166.2 mm | 131.5 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Aluminium | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Pantone: Bronze Green, Malibu Blue | Gray, Black, Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 8.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,560 px | 1,340 px |
| Pixel density | 274 ppi | 180 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 860 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 73.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,040 mAh | 7,100 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side / power button |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | F |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 71 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo IdeaTab 2025vsMotorola Moto Pad 60 Neo
vs
Lenovo Tab K11 G2vsMotorola Moto Pad 60 Neo
vs
Blackview Zeno 10vsMotorola Moto Pad 60 Neo
6.66.5
vs
Acer Iconia Tab A12-11vsMotorola Moto Pad 60 Neo
vs
UleFone RugKing Pad ProvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.65.4
vs
Nexall N90vsUleFone RugKing Pad Pro