vs
5.9Display5.6
3.7Battery4.1
5.2Memory & storage5.2
Why is iPlay 80 mini Pro better than RugKing Pad Pro?
- Weight200 g vs 540 g2.7×
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 180 ppi+50%
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 12.4 mm+70%
- Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 800 px+50%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 1,340 px+43%
- Screen-to-body ratio80.1% vs 73.3%+9%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is RugKing Pad Pro better than iPlay 80 mini Pro?
- Cellular (LTE)No · iPlay 80 mini Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity6,050 mAh vs 7,100 mAh+17%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 860 nits+91%
- Screen size8.4″ vs 8.7″+3%
- eSIMNo · iPlay 80 mini Pro: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 540 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 12.4 mm |
| Height | 7 mm | 222 mm |
| Width | 126 mm | 131.5 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Gray | Gray, Black, Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.4″ | 8.7″ |
| Panel | LTPS TFT | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,340 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 180 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 860 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.1% | 73.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Process | — | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,050 mAh | 7,100 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side / power button |
| Sensors | — | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | — | 16 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Front camera | — | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | F |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 71 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Nexall N90vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.55.4
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.55.4
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SEvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
4.95.4
vs
Blackview Zeno 5vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
6.05.4
vs
Nexall N90vsUleFone RugKing Pad Pro