vs
5.8Display5.5
3.7Battery4.1
5.2Memory & storage5.2
Why is iPlay 80 mini Pro better than RugKing Pad Pro?
- Weight200 g vs 540 g2.7×
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 180 ppi+50%
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 12.4 mm+70%
- Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 800 px+50%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 1,340 px+43%
- Screen-to-body ratio80.1% vs 73.3%+9%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is RugKing Pad Pro better than iPlay 80 mini Pro?
- Cellular (LTE)No · iPlay 80 mini Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity6,050 mAh vs 7,100 mAh+17%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 860 nits+91%
- Screen size8.4″ vs 8.7″+3%
- eSIMNo · iPlay 80 mini Pro: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 540 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 12.4 mm |
| Height | 7 mm | 222 mm |
| Width | 126 mm | 131.5 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Gray | Gray, Black, Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.4″ | 8.7″ |
| Panel | LTPS TFT | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,340 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 180 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 860 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.1% | 73.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Process | — | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,050 mAh | 7,100 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side / power button |
| Sensors | — | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | — | 16 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Front camera | — | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | F |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 71 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Nexall N90vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
vs
AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini ProvsAlldoCube iPlay 70 mini Pro
5.45.9
vs
AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini ProvsDenver TIO-80115KBUP
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.55.4
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.45.4
vs
Nexall N90vsUleFone RugKing Pad Pro