vs
9.0Display9.2
8.9Performance9.3
8.2Battery9.4
9.4Memory & storage8.2
7.2Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pad 3 ProPad 5 (China)
| Pad 3 Pro | Pad 5 (China) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 268.7 mm | 266.9 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Width | 195.1 mm | 193.4 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm | 6 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 586 g | 577 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pad 3 Pro better than Pad 5 (China)?
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
Why is Pad 5 (China) better than Pad 3 Pro?
- Battery capacity9,510 mAh vs 10,420 mAh+10%
- CPU frequency3.39 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+7%
- Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
- Thickness6.5 mm vs 6 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 586 g | 577 g |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm | 6 mm |
| Height | 268.7 mm | 266.9 mm |
| Width | 195.1 mm | 193.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Aluminium | — |
| Colours | Blue, Gold | Silver, Gray, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12.1″ | 12.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 2,120 px | 2,120 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 3,000 px | 3,000 px |
| Pixel density | 304 ppi | 304 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 900 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 86.2% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.39 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,333,285 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,500 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,700 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 9,510 mAh | 10,420 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | Yes | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro, compass | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/2.2 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14.1 | ColorOS 16 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4vsOPPO Pad 3 Pro
9.09.0
vs
Honor MagicPad 2 12.3vsOPPO Pad 3 Pro
8.89.0
vs
OPPO Pad 3 ProvsZTE nubia RedMagic Nova
9.08.9
vs
OPPO Pad 4 ProvsOPPO Pad 3 Pro
9.59.0
vs
OPPO Pad 3 ProvsHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)
9.09.3
vs
OPPO Pad 3 ProvsHuawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
9.09.5