vs
5.4Display5.8
3.7Memory & storage5.2
Why is PET 11080-F428E better than Black Shark Pad 7?
PET 11080-F428E has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Black Shark Pad 7 better than PET 11080-F428E?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Cellular (LTE)No · PET 11080-F428E: Yes
- Weight784 g vs 505 g+55%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 784 g | 505 g |
| Thickness | — | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 16 mm | 254.6 mm |
| Width | — | 166.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Colours | — | Gray, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 11″ |
| Panel | — | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 1,900 px |
| Pixel density | — | 204 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 420 nits | 420 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 83% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio | Mediatek Helio G88 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 2 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 339,004 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,360 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 7,700 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | — | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | — | No |
| GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | — | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Front camera | — | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 15 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 2.0 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 91 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | E | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Peaq PET 11080-F428EvsXiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7
5.14.9
vs
Peaq PET 11080-F428EvsLenovo Tab M11
5.15.2
vs
Peaq PET 11080-F428EvsTecno Megapad
5.15.2
vs
Peaq PET 11080-F428EvsTCL Tab 10 NxtPaper
5.15.3
vs
Peaq PET 11080-F428EvsOukitel RT3 Pro
5.15.0
vs
Peaq PET 11080-F428EvsUleFone Tab A10 Pro
5.15.0