zh.md
Compare
Galaxy Tab A11+ vs Redmi Pad 2

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2

What Galaxy Tab A11+ does better (10) and where Redmi Pad 2 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2025Galaxy Tab A11+

6.5Score

10 advantages≈ $300

Xiaomi · 2025Redmi Pad 2

6.7Score

6 advantages≈ $250

Higher score

6.1Display7.2

6.2Performance5.1

4.8Battery6.5

6.1Memory & storage6.1

7.3Features4.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab A11+Redmi Pad 2

	Galaxy Tab A11+	Redmi Pad 2	Difference
Height	257.1 mm	254.6 mm	+2.5 mm
Width	168.7 mm	166 mm	+2.7 mm
Thickness	6.9 mm	7.4 mm	−0.5 mm
Weight	477 g	510 g	−33 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab A11+ better than Redmi Pad 2?

AnTuTu score828,051 vs 570,469+45%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,102 vs 1,980+57%
5GYes · Redmi Pad 2: No
Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
eSIMYes · Redmi Pad 2: No
CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
Weight477 g vs 510 g+7%
Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
Charged in 30 min25% vs 17%+47%
Thickness6.9 mm vs 7.4 mm+7%

Why is Redmi Pad 2 better than Galaxy Tab A11+?

Battery capacity7,040 mAh vs 9,000 mAh+28%
Pixel density206 ppi vs 274 ppi+33%
Measured brightness510 nits vs 527 nits+3%
Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 1,600 px+33%
Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 2,560 px+33%
Screen-to-body ratio80.9% vs 83%+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+≈ $3006.5	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2≈ $2506.7
Design
Weight	477 g	510 g
Thickness	6.9 mm	7.4 mm
Height	257.1 mm	254.6 mm
Width	168.7 mm	166 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP52	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	—
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 3 or Panda glass
Colours	Gray, Silver	Graphite Gray, Mint Green, Lavender Purple
Display
Screen size	11″	11″
Panel	TFT LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	1,200 px	1,600 px
Resolution (long side)	1,920 px	2,560 px
Pixel density	206 ppi	274 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	90 Hz
Peak brightness	—	600 nits
Measured brightness	510 nits	527 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	80.9%	83%
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7300	Mediatek Helio G100 Ultra
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	828,051	570,469
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,102	1,980
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	7,040 mAh	9,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.2 h
Wired charging	25 W	18 W
Charged in 30 min	25%	17%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	Yes
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	—
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stylus support	—	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-26.9 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	Yes
Sensors	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass	Accelerometer, gyro/compass (cellular model only)
Cameras
Rear camera	8 MP	8 MP
Rear camera aperture	—	f/2
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Front camera	5 MP	5 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 8	HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised	7	—
EU label
Energy class	E	—
Battery charge cycles	1,200	—
Endurance per cycle	96 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	E	—