zh.md
Compare
Galaxy Tab A11 vs RugKing Pad Pro

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 vs UleFone RugKing Pad Pro

What Galaxy Tab A11 does better (9) and where RugKing Pad Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2025Galaxy Tab A11

5.2Score

9 advantages≈ $190

UleFone · 2026RugKing Pad Pro

5.6Score

9 advantages≈ $190

Higher score

3.8Display5.6

4.9Performance4.8

3.3Battery4.1

4.8Memory & storage5.2

5.5Features4.1

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab A11RugKing Pad Pro

	Galaxy Tab A11	RugKing Pad Pro	Difference
Height	211 mm	222 mm	−11 mm
Width	124.7 mm	131.5 mm	−6.8 mm
Thickness	8 mm	12.4 mm	−4.4 mm
Weight	335 g	540 g	−205 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab A11 better than RugKing Pad Pro?

Stereo speakersYes · RugKing Pad Pro: No
Weight335 g vs 540 g+61%
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+22%
Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
Energy classD vs F
Thickness8 mm vs 12.4 mm+55%
Endurance per cycle94 h vs 71 h+31%
Battery charge cycles1,200 vs 1,000+20%
Screen-to-body ratio81.7% vs 73.3%+11%

Why is RugKing Pad Pro better than Galaxy Tab A11?

Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 7,100 mAh+39%
Peak brightness500 nits vs 860 nits+72%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx84×
Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
eSIMNo · Galaxy Tab A11: Yes
Rear camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
Drop resistance classC vs A
Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
Front camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy Tab A11≈ $1905.2	UleFone RugKing Pad Pro≈ $1905.6
Design
Weight	335 g	540 g
Thickness	8 mm	12.4 mm
Height	211 mm	222 mm
Width	124.7 mm	131.5 mm
Ingress protection	IP52	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Colours	Gray, Silver	Gray, Black, Yellow
Display
Screen size	8.7″	8.7″
Panel	TFT LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	800 px	800 px
Resolution (long side)	1,340 px	1,340 px
Pixel density	179 ppi	180 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	90 Hz
Peak brightness	500 nits	860 nits
Measured brightness	436 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	81.7%	73.3%
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G99	Unisoc T7250
Chip maker	MediaTek	Unisoc
Process	6 nm	12 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	1.8 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali-G57 MP1
AnTuTu score	545,546	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,049	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage (base)	64 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,100 mAh	7,100 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Wired charging	15 W	18 W
Charged in 30 min	26%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	Yes
5G	No	No
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	No	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5.2
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
NFC	No	Yes
GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	Yes
Fingerprint sensor	—	Side / power button
Sensors	Accelerometer, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera	8 MP	16 MP
Rear camera aperture	—	f/1.8
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Front camera	5 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 8	—
Major OS updates promised	7	—
EU label
Energy class	D	F
Battery charge cycles	1,200	1,000
Endurance per cycle	94 h	71 h
Repairability class	C	C
Drop resistance class	C	A