zh.md
Compare
Galaxy Tab S9+ vs nubia Pad 3D

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ vs ZTE nubia Pad 3D

What Galaxy Tab S9+ does better (21) and where nubia Pad 3D wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab S9+

9.2Score

21 advantages≈ $1,100

Higher score

ZTE · 2023nubia Pad 3D

7.8Score

1 advantage≈ $1,400

8.8Display8.1

8.5Performance7.9

8.4Battery7.3

9.2Memory & storage6.1

9.4Features6.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab S9+nubia Pad 3D

	Galaxy Tab S9+	nubia Pad 3D	Difference
Height	285.4 mm	285 mm	+0.4 mm
Width	185.4 mm	190 mm	−4.6 mm
Thickness	5.7 mm	8.5 mm	−2.8 mm
Weight	586 g	780 g	−194 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab S9+ better than nubia Pad 3D?

RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
OLED panelYes · nubia Pad 3D: No
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Cellular (LTE)Yes · nubia Pad 3D: No
5GYes · nubia Pad 3D: No
Battery capacity10,090 mAh vs 9,070 mAh+11%
Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
Weight586 g vs 780 g+33%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
eSIMYes · nubia Pad 3D: No
Ultra-wide cameraYes · nubia Pad 3D: No
CPU frequency3.36 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+18%

Why is nubia Pad 3D better than Galaxy Tab S9+?

Rear camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+≈ $1,1009.2	ZTE nubia Pad 3D≈ $1,4007.8
Design
Weight	586 g	780 g
Thickness	5.7 mm	8.5 mm
Height	285.4 mm	285 mm
Width	185.4 mm	190 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Aluminium	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass	Corning Gorilla Glass
Colours	Beige, Graphite	Gray
Display
Screen size	12.4″	12.4″
Panel	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (short side)	1,752 px	1,600 px
Resolution (long side)	2,800 px	2,560 px
Pixel density	266 ppi	243 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	600 nits	—
Measured brightness	550 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	84.3%	82.3%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2	Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	5 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.36 GHz	2.84 GHz
GPU	Adreno 740	Adreno 660
AnTuTu score	1,750,937	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	5,600	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	3,890	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	10,090 mAh	9,070 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	—
Wired charging	45 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	38%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.2
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 3.1
USB version	3.2	3.1
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	BDS
Features
Stylus support	Yes	—
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	16 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/2	f/1.9
Rear cameras	2	2
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	—
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Front camera	12 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	Yes	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 12L
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 6	—
Major OS updates promised	4	—