zh.md
Compare
Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra vs Pad 7

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra vs Xiaomi Pad 7

What Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra does better (17) and where Pad 7 wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra

9.2Score

17 advantages≈ $1,300

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2024Pad 7

8.2Score

9 advantages≈ $430

9.4Display8.8

8.1Performance8.2

7.9Battery7.2

9.7Memory & storage6.7

9.4Features7.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab S9 UltraPad 7

	Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	Pad 7	Difference
Height	326.4 mm	251.2 mm	+75.2 mm
Width	208.6 mm	173.4 mm	+35.2 mm
Thickness	5.5 mm	6.2 mm	−0.7 mm
Weight	732 g	500 g	+232 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra better than Pad 7?

Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
Battery capacity11,200 mAh vs 8,850 mAh+27%
OLED panelYes · Pad 7: No
Cellular (LTE)Yes · Pad 7: No
5GYes · Pad 7: No
RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
Screen size14.6″ vs 11.2″+30%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Memory card slotYes · Pad 7: No
eSIMYes · Pad 7: No
GPSYes · Pad 7: No
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pad 7: No

Why is Pad 7 better than Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra?

AnTuTu score1,199,328 vs 1,697,444+42%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
Weight732 g vs 500 g+46%
Pixel density239 ppi vs 344 ppi+44%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,835 vs 4,978+3%
Measured brightness642 nits vs 811 nits+26%
Charged in 30 min32% vs 50%+56%
Resolution (short side)1,848 px vs 2,136 px+16%
Resolution (long side)2,960 px vs 3,200 px+8%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra≈ $1,3009.2	Xiaomi Pad 7≈ $4308.2
Design
Weight	732 g	500 g
Thickness	5.5 mm	6.2 mm
Height	326.4 mm	251.2 mm
Width	208.6 mm	173.4 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Aluminium	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass	—
Colours	Beige, Graphite	Black, Blue, Green
Display
Screen size	14.6″	11.2″
Panel	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (short side)	1,848 px	2,136 px
Resolution (long side)	2,960 px	3,200 px
Pixel density	239 ppi	344 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	930 nits	800 nits
Measured brightness	642 nits	811 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.7%	85.8%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2	Qualcomm SM7675-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.36 GHz	2.8 GHz
GPU	Adreno 740	Adreno 732
AnTuTu score	1,199,328	1,697,444
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,835	4,978
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	3,829	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	11,200 mAh	8,850 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	11.1 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	32%	50%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.2	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-21.2 LUFS	—
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	13 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/2	f/2.2
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Front camera	12 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	Yes	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 6	HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised	4	4
EU label
Energy class	—	F
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	91 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A