zh.md
Compare
Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra vs Redmi Pad Pro

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro

What Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra does better (29) and where Redmi Pad Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra

9.2Score

29 advantages≈ $1,300

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2024Redmi Pad Pro

7.1Score

3 advantages≈ $220

9.4Display7.8

8.1Performance5.7

7.9Battery6.3

9.7Memory & storage6.1

9.4Features6.6

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab S9 UltraRedmi Pad Pro

	Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	Redmi Pad Pro	Difference
Height	326.4 mm	280 mm	+46.4 mm
Width	208.6 mm	181.9 mm	+26.7 mm
Thickness	5.5 mm	7.5 mm	−2 mm
Weight	732 g	571 g	+161 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra better than Redmi Pad Pro?

AnTuTu score1,199,328 vs 589,8892×
RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,829 vs 7864.9×
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,835 vs 2,840+70%
OLED panelYes · Redmi Pad Pro: No
Cellular (LTE)Yes · Redmi Pad Pro: No
Battery capacity11,200 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+12%
Screen size14.6″ vs 12.1″+21%
Peak brightness930 nits vs 600 nits+55%
Active use (test)11.1 h vs 9.6 h+16%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×

Why is Redmi Pad Pro better than Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra?

Weight732 g vs 571 g+28%
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra: Yes
Pixel density239 ppi vs 249 ppi+4%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra≈ $1,3009.2	Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro≈ $2207.1
Design
Weight	732 g	571 g
Thickness	5.5 mm	7.5 mm
Height	326.4 mm	280 mm
Width	208.6 mm	181.9 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Aluminium	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP68	IP52
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx2
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass	Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Colours	Beige, Graphite	Dark Gray, Blue, Green
Display
Screen size	14.6″	12.1″
Panel	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (short side)	1,848 px	1,600 px
Resolution (long side)	2,960 px	2,560 px
Pixel density	239 ppi	249 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	930 nits	600 nits
Measured brightness	642 nits	654 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.7%	83.4%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2	Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.36 GHz	2.4 GHz
GPU	Adreno 740	Adreno 710
AnTuTu score	1,199,328	589,889
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,835	2,840
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	3,829	786
Memory
RAM	16 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	11,200 mAh	10,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	11.1 h	9.6 h
Wired charging	45 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	32%	28%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.2
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	—
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-21.2 LUFS	-24.1 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	8 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/2	f/2
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Front camera	12 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	Yes	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 6	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	4	—