How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Galaxy Tab S9 vs Pad 7

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 vs Xiaomi Pad 7

What Galaxy Tab S9 does better (11) and where Pad 7 wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9
Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab S9
8.6Score
11 advantages≈ $540
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Pad 7
Xiaomi · 2024Pad 7
8.2Score
9 advantages≈ $430
8.3Display8.8
8.5Performance8.2
7.2Battery7.2
7.0Memory & storage6.7
9.4Features7.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab S9Pad 7
165.8 × 254.35.9173.4 × 251.26.2
Galaxy Tab S9Pad 7Difference
Height254.3 mm251.2 mm+3.1 mm
Width165.8 mm173.4 mm−7.6 mm
Thickness5.9 mm6.2 mm−0.3 mm
Weight498 g500 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab S9 better than Pad 7?

  1. OLED panelYes · Pad 7: No
  2. Cellular (LTE)Yes · Pad 7: No
  3. 5GYes · Pad 7: No
  4. AnTuTu score1,771,415 vs 1,697,444+4%
  5. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,838 vs 4,978+17%
  6. Memory card slotYes · Pad 7: No
  7. eSIMYes · Pad 7: No
  8. GPSYes · Pad 7: No
  9. CPU frequency3.36 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+20%
  10. Front camera12 MP vs 8 MP+50%
  11. Thickness5.9 mm vs 6.2 mm+5%

Why is Pad 7 better than Galaxy Tab S9?

  1. Battery capacity8,400 mAh vs 8,850 mAh+5%
  2. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  3. Measured brightness576 nits vs 811 nits+41%
  4. Peak brightness600 nits vs 800 nits+33%
  5. Pixel density274 ppi vs 344 ppi+26%
  6. Resolution (short side)1,600 px vs 2,136 px+34%
  7. Charged in 30 min38% vs 50%+32%
  8. Resolution (long side)2,560 px vs 3,200 px+25%
  9. Screen-to-body ratio83.2% vs 85.8%+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Pad 7Xiaomi Pad 7≈ $4308.2
Design
Weight498 g500 g
Thickness5.9 mm6.2 mm
Height254.3 mm251.2 mm
Width165.8 mm173.4 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackAluminiumAluminium
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass—
ColoursBeige, GraphiteBlack, Blue, Green
Display
Screen size11″11.2″
PanelDynamic AMOLED 2XIPS LCD
OLED panelYesNo
Resolution (short side)1,600 px2,136 px
Resolution (long side)2,560 px3,200 px
Pixel density274 ppi344 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness600 nits800 nits
Measured brightness576 nits811 nits
Screen-to-body ratio83.2%85.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm SM7675-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.36 GHz2.8 GHz
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 732
AnTuTu score1,771,4151,697,444
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,8384,978
3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,917—
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 3.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity8,400 mAh8,850 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Wired charging45 W45 W
Charged in 30 min38%50%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
5GYesNo
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.35.4
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.23.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)YesYes
NFCNoNo
GPSYesNo
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS—
Features
Stylus supportYesYes
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Fingerprint sensorUnder display—
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP13 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2f/2.2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps30 fps
Front camera12 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoYesNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOne UI 6HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised44
EU label
Energy class—F
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—91 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare