vs
5.5Display8.2
7.1Performance8.9
5.2Battery8.7
7.6Memory & storage9.1
6.7Features9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
NxtPaper 12 Pronubia RedMagic Tablet
| NxtPaper 12 Pro | nubia RedMagic Tablet | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 279 mm | 279.7 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Width | 192.5 mm | 181.9 mm | +10.6 mm |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 6.5 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 599 g | 613 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is NxtPaper 12 Pro better than nubia RedMagic Tablet?
- Memory card slotYes · nubia RedMagic Tablet: No
- Weight599 g vs 613 g+2%
Why is nubia RedMagic Tablet better than NxtPaper 12 Pro?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 144 Hz2.4×
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Wired charging18 W vs 80 W4.4×
- Battery capacity8,000 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+25%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Peak brightness370 nits vs 600 nits+62%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz+25%
- Front camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Pixel density213 ppi vs 249 ppi+17%
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
- Resolution (long side)2,160 px vs 2,560 px+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 599 g | 613 g |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 6.5 mm |
| Height | 279 mm | 279.7 mm |
| Width | 192.5 mm | 181.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Colours | Navy Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12.2″ | 12.1″ |
| Panel | NCVM IPS | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,440 px | 1,600 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,160 px | 2,560 px |
| Pixel density | 213 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 370 nits | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.5% | 83.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8771 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 730 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,000 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Pad 6vsTCL NxtPaper 12 Pro
7.26.8
vs
TCL NxtPaper 12 ProvsOSCAL Pad 18
6.87.1
vs
Cubot Tab KingKongvsTCL NxtPaper 12 Pro
6.86.8
vs
TCL NxtPaper 12 ProvsUmidigi Active T1
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9vsZTE nubia RedMagic Tablet
8.69.3
vs
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14vsZTE nubia RedMagic Tablet
8.99.3

