zh.md
Compare
Galaxy Tab S9 vs nubia RedMagic Tablet

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic Tablet

What Galaxy Tab S9 does better (10) and where nubia RedMagic Tablet wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab S9

8.6Score

10 advantages≈ $540

ZTE · 2023nubia RedMagic Tablet

9.3Score

9 advantages≈ $540

Higher score

8.3Display8.2

8.5Performance8.9

7.2Battery8.7

7.0Memory & storage9.1

9.4Features9.6

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab S9nubia RedMagic Tablet

	Galaxy Tab S9	nubia RedMagic Tablet	Difference
Height	254.3 mm	279.7 mm	−25.4 mm
Width	165.8 mm	181.9 mm	−16.1 mm
Thickness	5.9 mm	6.5 mm	−0.6 mm
Weight	498 g	613 g	−115 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab S9 better than nubia RedMagic Tablet?

OLED panelYes · nubia RedMagic Tablet: No
Weight498 g vs 613 g+23%
Memory card slotYes · nubia RedMagic Tablet: No
eSIMYes · nubia RedMagic Tablet: No
Max video4K vs 1080p
CPU frequency3.36 GHz vs 3 GHz+12%
Pixel density274 ppi vs 249 ppi+10%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
Thickness5.9 mm vs 6.5 mm+10%
USB version3.2 vs 3.1+3%

Why is nubia RedMagic Tablet better than Galaxy Tab S9?

Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Battery capacity8,400 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+19%
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
Wired charging45 W vs 80 W+78%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
Screen size11″ vs 12.1″+10%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Charged in 30 min38% vs 62%+63%
Front camera12 MP vs 16 MP+33%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9≈ $5408.6	ZTE nubia RedMagic Tablet≈ $5409.3
Design
Weight	498 g	613 g
Thickness	5.9 mm	6.5 mm
Height	254.3 mm	279.7 mm
Width	165.8 mm	181.9 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Aluminium	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass	—
Colours	Beige, Graphite	Black
Display
Screen size	11″	12.1″
Panel	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (short side)	1,600 px	1,600 px
Resolution (long side)	2,560 px	2,560 px
Pixel density	274 ppi	249 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	600 nits	600 nits
Measured brightness	576 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	83.2%	83.4%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2	Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.36 GHz	3 GHz
GPU	Adreno 740	Adreno 730
AnTuTu score	1,771,415	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	5,838	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	3,917	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	8,400 mAh	10,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Wired charging	45 W	80 W
Charged in 30 min	38%	62%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	Yes
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 3.1
USB version	3.2	3.1
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	—
NFC	No	Yes
GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stylus support	Yes	—
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	13 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/2	—
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Front camera	12 MP	16 MP
4K front-camera video	Yes	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 6	—
Major OS updates promised	4	—