vs
9.2Display9.1
9.8Performance9.0
7.9Battery9.4
9.4Memory & storage9.1
7.5Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Pad UltraiQOO Pad2 Pro
| iQOO Pad Ultra | iQOO Pad2 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 197.4 mm | 289.6 mm | −92.2 mm |
| Width | 126.3 mm | 198.3 mm | −72 mm |
| Thickness | 5.7 mm | 6.6 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 298 g | 679 g | −381 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Pad Ultra better than iQOO Pad2 Pro?
- AnTuTu score4,518,403 vs 2,347,116+93%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 900 nits5×
- Weight298 g vs 679 g2.3×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)11,703 vs 7,567+55%
- OLED panelYes · iQOO Pad2 Pro: No
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- CPU frequency5.01 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+47%
- Process2 nm vs 4 nm2×
- Pixel density309 ppi vs 286 ppi+8%
- Thickness5.7 mm vs 6.6 mm+16%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.1% vs 87.6%+3%
Why is iQOO Pad2 Pro better than iQOO Pad Ultra?
- Battery capacity9,020 mAh vs 11,500 mAh+27%
- Screen size8.8″ vs 13″+48%
- GPSNo · iQOO Pad Ultra: Yes
- Resolution (short side)1,440 px vs 2,064 px+43%
- Resolution (long side)2,304 px vs 3,096 px+34%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 298 g | 679 g |
| Thickness | 5.7 mm | 6.6 mm |
| Height | 197.4 mm | 289.6 mm |
| Width | 126.3 mm | 198.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Gray, Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.8″ | 13″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,440 px | 2,064 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,304 px | 3,096 px |
| Pixel density | 309 ppi | 286 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 900 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1% | 87.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8975 Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 2 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 5.01 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 850 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| AnTuTu score | 4,518,403 | 2,347,116 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 11,703 | 7,567 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 9,020 mAh | 11,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 66 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | Yes | — |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| GPS | No | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | — | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 17 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 7 HD | OriginOS 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo Legion Tab G5vsVivo iQOO Pad Ultra
vs
Vivo iQOO Pad UltravsRedmagic Astra 2 Gaming
vs
Honor MagicPad4vsVivo iQOO Pad Ultra
9.69.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S12+vsVivo iQOO Pad Ultra
9.59.4
vs
Vivo iQOO Pad UltravsHuawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)
9.49.5
vs
Vivo iQOO Pad UltravsLenovo Yoga Tab Plus Gen 2
9.49.7