How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Pad vs Pad 6

Vivo Pad vs Xiaomi Pad 6

What Pad does better (2) and where Pad 6 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Vivo Pad
Vivo · 2022Pad
7.4Score
2 advantages≈ $390
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Pad 6
Xiaomi · 2023Pad 6
7.2Score
6 advantages≈ $430
7.5Display7.8
7.7Performance6.9
6.7Battery6.1
5.6Memory & storage5.6
6.4Features6.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

PadPad 6
164.7 × 253.26.6165.2 × 2546.5
PadPad 6Difference
Height253.2 mm254 mm−0.8 mm
Width164.7 mm165.2 mm−0.5 mm
Thickness6.6 mm6.5 mm+0.1 mm
Weight489 g490 g−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pad better than Pad 6?

  1. Wired charging44 W vs 33 W+33%
  2. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pad 6: No

Why is Pad 6 better than Pad?

  1. Battery capacity8,040 mAh vs 8,840 mAh+10%
  2. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  3. Pixel density274 ppi vs 309 ppi+13%
  4. Resolution (short side)1,600 px vs 1,800 px+12%
  5. Resolution (long side)2,560 px vs 2,880 px+12%
  6. USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo PadVivo Pad≈ $3907.4
Xiaomi Pad 6Xiaomi Pad 6≈ $4307.2
Design
Weight489 g490 g
Thickness6.6 mm6.5 mm
Height253.2 mm254 mm
Width164.7 mm165.2 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackAluminiumAluminium
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 3
ColoursBlack, BlueBlack, Blue, Gold
Display
Screen size11″11″
PanelIPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,600 px1,800 px
Resolution (long side)2,560 px2,880 px
Pixel density274 ppi309 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness—550 nits
Measured brightness—500 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.1%83.6%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5GQualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process7 nm7 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.2 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 650
AnTuTu score—1,005,598
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—3,506
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,147
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity8,040 mAh8,840 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—9.7 h
Wired charging44 W33 W
Charged in 30 min—38%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.25.2
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.13.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)—Yes
NFCYesNo
GPSYesYes
Features
Stylus supportYesYes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-23.7 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
SensorsAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassAccelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP13 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2.2f/2.2
Rear cameras21
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps30 fps
Front camera8 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 12Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS HDMIUI Pad 14
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare