How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Terra Pad 1201 vs Black Shark Pad 6

Wortmann Terra Pad 1201 vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6

What Terra Pad 1201 does better (1) and where Black Shark Pad 6 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Wortmann Terra Pad 1201
Wortmann · 2024Terra Pad 1201
1 advantage≈ $360
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6
Xiaomi · 2024Black Shark Pad 6
6.8Score
2 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
8.0Memory & storage7.6

Why is Terra Pad 1201 better than Black Shark Pad 6?

  1. Screen size12.6″ vs 11″+15%

Why is Black Shark Pad 6 better than Terra Pad 1201?

  1. Cellular (LTE)No · Terra Pad 1201: Yes
  2. Weight550 g vs 523 g+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight550 g523 g
Thickness—7.9 mm
Height7 mm265.8 mm
Width—168.3 mm
Ingress protectionIP42—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2—
Colours—Gray, Green
Display
Screen size12.6″11″
Panel—IPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)—1,200 px
Resolution (long side)—1,920 px
Pixel density—206 ppi
Refresh rate—90 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio—78.4%
Performance
ChipsetMediaTekUnisoc Tiger T616
Chip makerMediaTekUnisoc
Process—12 nm
CPU cores—8
CPU frequency—2 GHz
GPU—Mali-G57 MP1
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Memory card slot—Yes
Battery
Battery capacity—8,800 mAh
Wired charging—18 W
Wireless charging—No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoYes
5G—No
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoYes
Wi-Fi standard—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.1
USB—USB Type-C 2.0
USB version—2
NFC—No
GPS—Yes
Satellite navigation—GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack—No
Sensors—Accelerometer
Cameras
Rear camera—16 MP
Rear cameras—1
Ultra-wide camera—No
Optical stabilisation—No
Max video—1080p
Front camera—8 MP
4K front-camera video—No
Software
OS at launch—Android 14
Platform—Android
EU label
Energy classE—
Battery charge cycles800—
Endurance per cycle118 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classE—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare