vs
7.2Memory & storage8.0
Why is MatePad 11.5 S better than Terra Pad 1201?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight510 g vs 550 g+8%
Why is Terra Pad 1201 better than MatePad 11.5 S?
- Screen size11.5″ vs 12.6″+10%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 510 g | 550 g |
| Thickness | 6.2 mm | — |
| Height | 261 mm | 7 mm |
| Width | 177.2 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Space Gray, Silver Frost, Violet | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11.5″ | 12.6″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,840 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,800 px | — |
| Pixel density | 291 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 447 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 9000WL | MediaTek |
| Chip maker | Kirin | MediaTek |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.49 GHz | — |
| GPU | Maleoon 910 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 751,382 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,882 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,800 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 22 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | — |
| USB version | 3 | — |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | Yes | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| GPS | No | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro | — |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | — |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Front camera | 8 MP | — |
| 4K front-camera video | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Harmony OS 4.2 | — |
| Platform | Other (Windows, …) | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | E |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 118 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | E |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad ProvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
7.17.6
vs
Huawei MatePad 11.5 SvsTeclast T65 Max
7.67.2
vs
Xiaomi Poco PadvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
7.37.6
vs
Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)vsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
7.57.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5GvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
7.97.6
vs
Apple iPad Air 13 (2024)vsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
8.27.6