vs
6.2Display7.6
5.4Performance5.8
6.4Battery6.0
7.6Memory & storage7.6
5.8Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Black Shark Pad 6Poco Pad
| Black Shark Pad 6 | Poco Pad | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 265.8 mm | 280 mm | −14.2 mm |
| Width | 168.3 mm | 181.9 mm | −13.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 523 g | 571 g | −48 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Black Shark Pad 6 better than Poco Pad?
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · Poco Pad: No
- GPSYes · Poco Pad: No
- Rear camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Weight523 g vs 571 g+9%
Why is Poco Pad better than Black Shark Pad 6?
- 5GNo · Black Shark Pad 6: Yes
- Battery capacity8,800 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+14%
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Process12 nm vs 4 nm3×
- Screen size11″ vs 12.1″+10%
- Pixel density206 ppi vs 249 ppi+21%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Black Shark Pad 6: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 1,600 px+33%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 2,560 px+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 523 g | 571 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 265.8 mm | 280 mm |
| Width | 168.3 mm | 181.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Gray, Green | Dark Gray, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 12.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,600 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 2,560 px |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 564 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 78.4% | 83.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 600,399 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,909 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 793 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,800 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 9.2 h |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 29% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | — | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -23.9 LUFS |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6vsWortmann Terra Pad 1201
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6vsLenovo Tab Plus
6.86.5
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7vsXiaomi Black Shark Pad 6
5.56.8
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6vsOSCAL Pad 16
6.86.4
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6vsUmidigi G7 Tab Pro
6.86.7
vs
Xiaomi Poco PadvsWortmann Terra Pad 1201