zh.md
Compare
Pad 6S Pro 12.4 vs Pad 7 Ultra

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 vs Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra

What Pad 6S Pro 12.4 does better (3) and where Pad 7 Ultra wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Xiaomi · 2024Pad 6S Pro 12.4

9.0Score

3 advantages≈ $760

Xiaomi · 2025Pad 7 Ultra

9.7Score

13 advantages≈ $760

Higher score

9.1Display9.7

8.5Performance9.7

7.8Battery9.7

9.4Memory & storage9.4

8.2Features8.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Pad 6S Pro 12.4Pad 7 Ultra

	Pad 6S Pro 12.4	Pad 7 Ultra	Difference
Height	278.7 mm	305.8 mm	−27.1 mm
Width	191.6 mm	207.5 mm	−15.9 mm
Thickness	6.3 mm	5.1 mm	+1.2 mm
Weight	590 g	609 g	−19 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pad 6S Pro 12.4 better than Pad 7 Ultra?

Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Pixel density295 ppi vs 275 ppi+7%
Weight590 g vs 609 g+3%

Why is Pad 7 Ultra better than Pad 6S Pro 12.4?

AnTuTu score1,539,762 vs 2,963,052+92%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,268 vs 9,191+74%
OLED panelNo · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: Yes
Battery capacity10,000 mAh vs 12,000 mAh+20%
Peak brightness900 nits vs 1,600 nits+78%
Screen size12.4″ vs 14″+13%
CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz+16%
Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
Thickness6.3 mm vs 5.1 mm+24%
Screen-to-body ratio85.7% vs 92%+7%
Resolution (short side)2,032 px vs 2,136 px+5%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4≈ $7609.0	Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra≈ $7609.7
Design
Weight	590 g	609 g
Thickness	6.3 mm	5.1 mm
Height	278.7 mm	305.8 mm
Width	191.6 mm	207.5 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Aluminium	Aluminium
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Black, Blue, Green	Gray, Blue
Display
Screen size	12.4″	14″
Panel	IPS LCD	AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (short side)	2,032 px	2,136 px
Resolution (long side)	3,048 px	3,200 px
Pixel density	295 ppi	275 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	900 nits	1,600 nits
Measured brightness	848 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	85.7%	92%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2	Xring O1
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Xring
Process	4 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	3.2 GHz	3.7 GHz
GPU	Adreno 740	Immortalis-G925 MP16
AnTuTu score	1,539,762	2,963,052
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	5,268	9,191
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	2,970	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,000 mAh	12,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	11.2 h	—
Wired charging	120 W	120 W
Charged in 30 min	135%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	No
5G	No	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2
USB version	3.2	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	Yes
GPS	No	No
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-20.5 LUFS	—
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	Side / power button
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera	50 MP	50 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Front camera	32 MP	32 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	HyperOS	HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised	3	—