zh.md
Compare
MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024) vs Pad 6S Pro 12.4

Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024) vs Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4

What MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024) does better (9) and where Pad 6S Pro 12.4 wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2024MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)

9.3Score

9 advantages≈ $620

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2024Pad 6S Pro 12.4

9.0Score

15 advantages≈ $760

9.8Display9.1

7.1Performance8.5

9.2Battery7.8

9.4Memory & storage9.4

8.0Features8.2

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)Pad 6S Pro 12.4

	MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)	Pad 6S Pro 12.4	Difference
Height	271.3 mm	278.7 mm	−7.4 mm
Width	182.5 mm	191.6 mm	−9.1 mm
Thickness	5.5 mm	6.3 mm	−0.8 mm
Weight	508 g	590 g	−82 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024) better than Pad 6S Pro 12.4?

Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 900 nits2.2×
OLED panelYes · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: No
Cellular (LTE)Yes · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: No
Measured brightness1,047 nits vs 848 nits+23%
GPSYes · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: No
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: No
Weight508 g vs 590 g+16%
Thickness5.5 mm vs 6.3 mm+15%
Screen-to-body ratio89% vs 85.7%+4%

Why is Pad 6S Pro 12.4 better than MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)?

AnTuTu score726,657 vs 1,539,7622.1×
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,213 vs 2,9702.4×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,550 vs 5,268+16%
Rear camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 7+40%
Charged in 30 min64% vs 135%2.1×
CPU frequency2.62 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+22%
Front camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
Wired charging100 W vs 120 W+20%
Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
Pixel density275 ppi vs 295 ppi+7%
Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 2,032 px+10%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)≈ $6209.3	Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4≈ $7609.0
Design
Weight	508 g	590 g
Thickness	5.5 mm	6.3 mm
Height	271.3 mm	278.7 mm
Width	182.5 mm	191.6 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Gold, White, Black	Black, Blue, Green
Display
Screen size	12.2″	12.4″
Panel	Dual-layer OLED	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (short side)	1,840 px	2,032 px
Resolution (long side)	2,800 px	3,048 px
Pixel density	275 ppi	295 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	2,000 nits	900 nits
Measured brightness	1,047 nits	848 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89%	85.7%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin 9000S	Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	7 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.62 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Maleoon 910 MP4	Adreno 740
AnTuTu score	726,657	1,539,762
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,550	5,268
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	1,213	2,970
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,100 mAh	10,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.2 h
Wired charging	100 W	120 W
Charged in 30 min	64%	135%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	—	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.2	5.3
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.1	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	—	Yes
NFC	No	Yes
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Satellite messaging	Yes	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-22.2 LUFS	-20.5 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	Side / power button
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	50 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Front camera	16 MP	32 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	HarmonyOS 4.2	Android 14
Platform	HarmonyOS	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	—	3