vs
6.8Display4.6
7.4Performance5.4
4.3Battery3.7
5.2Memory & storage6.1
9.3Features4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Iconia iM11-22M5GXpad 30E
| Iconia iM11-22M5G | Xpad 30E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 261.7 mm | 257.7 mm | +4 mm |
| Width | 177.7 mm | 169.2 mm | +8.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.9 mm | = |
| Weight | 535 g | 498 g | +37 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Iconia iM11-22M5G better than Xpad 30E?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Wired charging18 W vs 10 W+80%
- Battery capacity7,400 mAh vs 7,200 mAh+3%
- Screen size11.4″ vs 11″+4%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz+30%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Rear camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Pixel density230 ppi vs 206 ppi+12%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 440 nits+2%
- Front camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
- Resolution (short side)1,440 px vs 1,200 px+20%
Why is Xpad 30E better than Iconia iM11-22M5G?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight535 g vs 498 g+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 535 g | 498 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 261.7 mm | 257.7 mm |
| Width | 177.7 mm | 169.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Aluminium | — |
| Colours | Silver | Deep Blue, Dreamy Purple, Forest Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11.4″ | 11″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,440 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,200 px | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | 230 ppi | 206 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 440 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.3% | 80.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Mediatek Helio G80 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,400 mAh | 7,200 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 10 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (top-mounted) | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Iconia iM11-22M5GvsOSCAL Pad 200
6.86.8
vs
Acer Iconia iM11-22M5GvsHANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7B
vs
Acer Iconia iM11-22M5GvsUleFone A12 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Acer Iconia iM11-22M5GvsUleFone Tab A12 Pro
6.86.7
vs
Xoro MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2vsInfinix Xpad 30E
5.85.7
vs
Acer Iconia A16 A16-21vsInfinix Xpad 30E