vs
5.2Memory & storage2.5
Why is iPlay 80 mini Pro better than TIO-80115KBUP?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Screen size8.4″ vs 8″+5%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is TIO-80115KBUP better than iPlay 80 mini Pro?
TIO-80115KBUP has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | — |
| Height | 7 mm | — |
| Width | 126 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Gray | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.4″ | 8″ |
| Panel | LTPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | — |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.1% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc | Allwinner |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Allwinner |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,050 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 18 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | G |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 18 h |
| Repairability class | — | D |
| Drop resistance class | — | E |
Related comparisons
vs
Nexall N90vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
vs
AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini ProvsAlldoCube iPlay 70 mini Pro
5.46.0
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.55.4
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.55.4
vs
UleFone RugKing Pad ProvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.65.4
vs
OSCAL Pad 200vsDenver TIO-80115KBUP