vs
5.2Memory & storage4.9
Why is iPlay 80 mini Pro better than N90?
- Weight200 g vs 615 g3.1×
Why is N90 better than iPlay 80 mini Pro?
- Screen size8.4″ vs 12″+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 615 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | — |
| Height | 7 mm | 8 mm |
| Width | 126 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Gray | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.4″ | 12″ |
| Panel | LTPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | — |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.1% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc | — |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,050 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 18 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | D |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 145 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.55.4
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.55.4
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SEvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
4.95.4
vs
UleFone RugKing Pad ProvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.65.4
vs
Blackview Zeno 5vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
6.05.4
vs
Nexall N90vsOSCAL Pad 200