vs
5.7Display4.8
2.1Performance5.9
2.2Battery4.2
2.1Memory & storage3.7
2.1Features4.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Viva HomeMatePad 10.4
| Viva Home | MatePad 10.4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 418.5 mm | 245.2 mm | +173.3 mm |
| Width | 266.3 mm | 155 mm | +111.3 mm |
| Thickness | 19.5 mm | 7.4 mm | +12.1 mm |
| Weight | 2,018 g | 450 g | +1,568 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Viva Home better than MatePad 10.4?
- Screen size17.3″ vs 10.4″+66%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · MatePad 10.4: No
Why is MatePad 10.4 better than Viva Home?
- RAM2 GB vs 6 GB3×
- Weight2,018 g vs 450 g4.5×
- Storage (max)32 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,250 mAh+45%
- Cellular (LTE)No · Viva Home: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Viva Home: Yes
- Pixel density127 ppi vs 224 ppi+76%
- CPU frequency1.5 GHz vs 2.27 GHz+51%
- Thickness19.5 mm vs 7.4 mm2.6×
- Front camera2 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- CPU cores4 vs 82×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 2,018 g | 450 g |
| Thickness | 19.5 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 418.5 mm | 245.2 mm |
| Width | 266.3 mm | 155 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | White, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 10.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,080 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 2,000 px |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | 224 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74% | 81% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8163 | Kirin 810 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Kirin |
| Process | — | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 4 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.5 GHz | 2.27 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G52 MP6 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,250 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 4 | 5.1 |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | — | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | — | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | EMUI 10 |
Related comparisons
vs
Allview Viva HomevsSamsung Galaxy Tab A 8.4 (2020)
3.63.8
vs
Allview Viva HomevsAmazon Fire HD 10 (2019)
3.64.3
vs
alcatel 3T 10vsAllview Viva Home
3.63.6
vs
Allview Viva HomevsHonor Pad X6
3.64.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)vsHuawei MatePad 10.4
4.95.4
vs
Apple iPad 10.2 (2020)vsHuawei MatePad 10.4
5.35.4