vs
2.9Memory & storage4.9
Why is Alexa Tablet 8 (2026) better than N90?
- Weight329 g vs 615 g+87%
Why is N90 better than Alexa Tablet 8 (2026)?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Screen size8.7″ vs 12″+38%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 329 g | 615 g |
| Height | — | 8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Aluminium | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Graphite, Rosette, Teal | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.7″ | 12″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,340 px | — |
| Pixel density | 179 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Kompanio 540 | — |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | — |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 18 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| GPS | No | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | — |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Front camera | 5 MP | — |
| 4K front-camera video | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | D |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 145 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
