Why is N90 better than Pad 200?
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Weight615 g vs 750 g+22%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx0
- Drop resistance classB vs C
- Endurance per cycle145 h vs 138 h+5%
Why is Pad 200 better than N90?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Screen size12″ vs 13.4″+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 615 g | 750 g |
| Thickness | — | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Width | — | 201.5 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP44 | IP50 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx0 |
| Colours | — | Space Grey, Glacier Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12″ | 13.4″ |
| Panel | — | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | — | 169 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 350 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 83.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Unisoc Tiger |
| Chip maker | — | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 8,300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 16 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| Interface | — | DokeOS 5.0 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | D |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 145 h | 138 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | B | C |
