vs
2.3Memory & storage2.5
Why is Link Mini Kids better than TIO-80115KBUP?
- Endurance per cycle51 h vs 18 h2.8×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx22×
- Energy classD vs G
- Drop resistance classB vs E
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is TIO-80115KBUP better than Link Mini Kids?
- Storage (max)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- RAM3 GB vs 4 GB+33%
- Screen size7″ vs 8″+14%
- Storage (base)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Battery charge cycles500 vs 800+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 337 g | — |
| Thickness | 15 mm | — |
| Height | 15 mm | — |
| Width | 150.7 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Brave Blue, Sweet Pink | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 8″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 600 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,024 px | — |
| Pixel density | 169 ppi | — |
| Peak brightness | 300 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 46.3% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Rockchip RK | Allwinner |
| Chip maker | Rockchip | Allwinner |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,000 mAh | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | DokeOS 5.0 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | G |
| Battery charge cycles | 500 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 51 h | 18 h |
| Repairability class | D | D |
| Drop resistance class | B | E |
Related comparisons
vs
Blackview Link Mini Kidsvsitel VistaTab 10 mini
3.53.7
vs
Blackview Link Mini Kidsvsitel VistaTab 12
3.54.2
vs
Blackview Link Mini Kidsvsitel VistaTab Go
3.54.0
vs
Blackview Link Mini Kidsvsitel VistaTab 11
3.54.0
vs
AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini ProvsDenver TIO-80115KBUP
vs
OSCAL Pad 200vsDenver TIO-80115KBUP