vs
2.5Memory & storage5.0
Why is TIO-80115KBUP better than Pad 200?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx0
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is Pad 200 better than TIO-80115KBUP?
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Screen size8″ vs 13.4″+68%
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- Endurance per cycle18 h vs 138 h7.7×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Energy classG vs D
- Repairability classD vs B
- Drop resistance classE vs C
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 750 g |
| Thickness | — | 7.9 mm |
| Height | — | 8 mm |
| Width | — | 201.5 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP50 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx0 |
| Colours | — | Space Grey, Glacier Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 13.4″ |
| Panel | — | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | — | 169 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 350 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 83.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Allwinner | Unisoc Tiger |
| Chip maker | Allwinner | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 8,300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | — | No |
| Dual SIM | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 16 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| Interface | — | DokeOS 5.0 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | D |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 18 h | 138 h |
| Repairability class | D | B |
| Drop resistance class | E | C |
