How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
630 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. MegaPad vs N90

Cubot MegaPad vs Nexall N90

What MegaPad does better (2) and where N90 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cubot MegaPad
Cubot · 2026MegaPad
6.6Score
2 advantages
Higher score
vs
Nexall N90
Nexall · 2026N90
2 advantages≈ $170
4.6Memory & storage4.9

Why is MegaPad better than N90?

  1. Cellular (LTE)Yes · N90: No
  2. Screen size13.4″ vs 12″+11%

Why is N90 better than MegaPad?

  1. RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
  2. Weight846 g vs 615 g+38%
Specifications

Side by side

Nexall N90Nexall N90≈ $170
Design
Weight846 g615 g
Thickness8.1 mm—
Height309.3 mm8 mm
Width208 mm—
Ingress protection—IP44
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
ColoursGray—
Display
Screen size13.4″12″
PanelIPS LCD—
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,200 px—
Resolution (long side)1,920 px—
Pixel density169 ppi—
Refresh rate60 Hz—
Screen-to-body ratio80.4%—
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G81—
Chip makerMediaTek—
Process12 nm—
CPU cores8—
CPU frequency2 GHz—
GPUMali-G52 MC2—
Memory
RAM6 GB8 GB
Storage (max)128 GB128 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Memory card slotYes—
Battery
Battery capacity14,700 mAh—
Wired charging18 W—
Wireless chargingNo—
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5—
Bluetooth5—
USBUSB Type-C 2.0—
USB version2—
NFCNo—
GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS—
Features
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5 mm headphone jackNo—
SensorsAccelerometer—
Cameras
Rear camera16 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Max video1080p—
Front camera8 MP—
4K front-camera videoNo—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16—
PlatformAndroid—
EU label
Energy class—D
Battery charge cycles—800
Endurance per cycle—145 h
Repairability class—B
Drop resistance class—B
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare