Why is U12 better than T20?
- Screen size12″ vs 10.1″+19%
- Battery charge cycles1,000 vs 800+25%
- Endurance per cycle91 h vs 77 h+18%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is T20 better than U12?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Weight567 g vs 412 g+38%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx0 vs IPx4
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Energy classF vs D
- Drop resistance classE vs B
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 567 g | 412 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | — |
| Height | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Width | 177.7 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP20 | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Aquamarine Blue, Misty Gray, Obsidian Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,000 px | — |
| Pixel density | 194 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 350 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.7% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger | Unisoc Tiger |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 9,000 mAh | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | F | D |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 91 h | 77 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | E | B |
