Why is T20 better than T50?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Weight412 g vs 498 g+21%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Why is T50 better than T20?
- Screen size10.1″ vs 11″+9%
- Endurance per cycle77 h vs 126 h+64%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 412 g | 498 g |
| Height | 8 mm | 9 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP44 | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 11″ |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Peak brightness | — | 350 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger | Unisoc Tiger |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | D |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 77 h | 126 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | B | B |
