How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Pad X9 Max vs Moto Pad 70 Pro

Honor Pad X9 Max vs Motorola Moto Pad 70 Pro

What Pad X9 Max does better (0) and where Moto Pad 70 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Honor Pad X9 Max
Honor · 2026Pad X9 Max
7.8Score
0 advantages≈ $350
vs
Motorola Moto Pad 70 Pro
Motorola · 2026Moto Pad 70 Pro
8.8Score
12 advantages≈ $410
Higher score
8.2Display9.1
8.7Battery9.4
4.1Memory & storage6.1

Why is Pad X9 Max better than Moto Pad 70 Pro?

Pad X9 Max has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Moto Pad 70 Pro better than Pad X9 Max?

  1. RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
  2. Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  3. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  4. Wired charging45 W vs 68 W+51%
  5. Pixel density228 ppi vs 318 ppi+39%
  6. Water resistance (IPx)IPx0 vs IPx2
  7. Peak brightness700 nits vs 800 nits+14%
  8. Weight618 g vs 598 g+3%
  9. Resolution (short side)1,560 px vs 2,190 px+40%
  10. Resolution (long side)2,500 px vs 3,504 px+40%
  11. Bluetooth5.1 vs 6+18%
  12. Thickness6.8 mm vs 6.2 mm+9%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor Pad X9 MaxHonor Pad X9 Max≈ $3507.8
Design
Weight618 g598 g
Thickness6.8 mm6.2 mm
Height7 mm296.5 mm
Width192.7 mm191.9 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Aluminium
Ingress protectionIP40IP52
Water resistance (IPx)IPx0IPx2
ColoursGrayPantone Titan
Display
Screen size13″13″
PanelIPS TFTIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,560 px2,190 px
Resolution (long side)2,500 px3,504 px
Pixel density228 ppi318 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness700 nits800 nits
Screen-to-body ratio85.4%86.1%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process—4 nm
CPU cores—8
CPU frequency—3.21 GHz
GPU—Adreno 825
Memory
RAM4 GB8 GB
Storage (max)128 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage type—UFS 3.1
Memory card slotYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity10,100 mAh10,200 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Wired charging45 W68 W
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
eSIM—No
Dual SIM—No
Wi-Fi standard—Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.16
USB—USB Type-C 3.2
USB version—3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)—Yes
NFC—No
GPS—No
Features
Stylus support—Yes
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack—No
Sensors—Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera—13 MP
Rear cameras—1
Ultra-wide camera—No
Optical stabilisation—No
Front camera—8 MP
4K front-camera video—No
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 10—
Major OS updates promised—2
EU label
Energy classE—
Battery charge cycles1,600—
Endurance per cycle146 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classE—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare