vs
7.7Display5.6
6.9Battery6.6
7.2Memory & storage7.6
Why is MatePad 11.5 S better than T65 Max?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 90 Hz+60%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 300 nits+67%
- Pixel density291 ppi vs 175 ppi+66%
- Wired charging22 W vs 15 W+50%
- Weight510 g vs 710 g+39%
- Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 1,200 px+53%
- Resolution (long side)2,800 px vs 1,920 px+46%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is T65 Max better than MatePad 11.5 S?
- Battery capacity8,800 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+14%
- Screen size11.5″ vs 13″+13%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · MatePad 11.5 S: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 510 g | 710 g |
| Thickness | 6.2 mm | — |
| Height | 261 mm | 8 mm |
| Width | 177.2 mm | — |
| Colours | Space Gray, Silver Frost, Violet | Space Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11.5″ | 13″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,840 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,800 px | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | 291 ppi | 175 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 447 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 9000WL | MediaTek Helio |
| Chip maker | Kirin | MediaTek |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.49 GHz | — |
| GPU | Maleoon 910 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 751,382 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,882 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,800 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 22 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | — |
| USB version | 3 | — |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | Yes | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| GPS | No | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro | — |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | — |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Front camera | 8 MP | — |
| 4K front-camera video | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Harmony OS 4.2 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Other (Windows, …) | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad ProvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
7.17.6
vs
Xiaomi Poco PadvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
7.37.6
vs
Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)vsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
7.57.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5GvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
7.97.6
vs
Huawei MatePad 11.5 SvsWortmann Terra Pad 1201
vs
Apple iPad Air 13 (2024)vsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
8.27.6