zh.md
Compare
MatePad 11.5 S vs Poco Pad

Huawei MatePad 11.5 S vs Xiaomi Poco Pad

What MatePad 11.5 S does better (13) and where Poco Pad wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2024MatePad 11.5 S

7.6Score

13 advantages

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2024Poco Pad

7.3Score

10 advantages≈ $300

7.7Display7.6

6.8Performance5.8

6.9Battery6.0

7.2Memory & storage7.6

5.6Features6.6

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad 11.5 SPoco Pad

	MatePad 11.5 S	Poco Pad	Difference
Height	261 mm	280 mm	−19 mm
Width	177.2 mm	181.9 mm	−4.7 mm
Thickness	6.2 mm	7.5 mm	−1.3 mm
Weight	510 g	571 g	−61 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad 11.5 S better than Poco Pad?

AnTuTu score751,382 vs 600,399+25%
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,882 vs 2,909+33%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Pixel density291 ppi vs 249 ppi+17%
Weight510 g vs 571 g+12%
CPU frequency2.49 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
USB version3 vs 2+50%
Thickness6.2 mm vs 7.5 mm+21%
Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 1,600 px+15%

Why is Poco Pad better than MatePad 11.5 S?

5GNo · MatePad 11.5 S: Yes
Battery capacity8,800 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+14%
Wired charging22 W vs 33 W+47%
Screen size11.5″ vs 12.1″+5%
Measured brightness447 nits vs 564 nits+26%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Memory card slotNo · MatePad 11.5 S: Yes
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · MatePad 11.5 S: Yes
Peak brightness500 nits vs 600 nits+20%
Charged in 30 min25% vs 29%+16%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad 11.5 S7.6	Xiaomi Poco Pad≈ $3007.3
Design
Weight	510 g	571 g
Thickness	6.2 mm	7.5 mm
Height	261 mm	280 mm
Width	177.2 mm	181.9 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Colours	Space Gray, Silver Frost, Violet	Dark Gray, Blue
Display
Screen size	11.5″	12.1″
Panel	TFT LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	1,840 px	1,600 px
Resolution (long side)	2,800 px	2,560 px
Pixel density	291 ppi	249 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	500 nits	600 nits
Measured brightness	447 nits	564 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	84.7%	83.4%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	HiSilicon Kirin 9000WL	Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	—	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.49 GHz	2.4 GHz
GPU	Maleoon 910	Adreno 710
AnTuTu score	751,382	600,399
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,882	2,909
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	793
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	8,800 mAh	10,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	9.2 h
Wired charging	22 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	25%	29%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	No
5G	No	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.2	5.2
USB	USB Type-C 3.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3	2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	—
NFC	No	No
GPS	No	No
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-23.9 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Sensors	Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	8 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/2
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Front camera	8 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Harmony OS 4.2	Android 14
Platform	Other (Windows, …)	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS