vs
8.7Display5.7
6.3Performance7.7
9.0Battery9.2
8.1Memory & storage5.6
4.9Features5.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad 12 XYoga Tab 13
| MatePad 12 X | Yoga Tab 13 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 270 mm | 293.4 mm | −23.4 mm |
| Width | 183 mm | 204 mm | −21 mm |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 6.2 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 555 g | 830 g | −275 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad 12 X better than Yoga Tab 13?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 60 Hz2.4×
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 400 nits2.5×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Weight555 g vs 830 g+50%
- Pixel density279 ppi vs 196 ppi+42%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen-to-body ratio86.3% vs 56.7%+52%
- Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 1,350 px+36%
- Resolution (long side)2,800 px vs 2,160 px+30%
- Thickness5.9 mm vs 6.2 mm+5%
Why is Yoga Tab 13 better than MatePad 12 X?
- Screen size12″ vs 13″+8%
- CPU frequency2.49 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+29%
- GPSNo · MatePad 12 X: Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 555 g | 830 g |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 6.2 mm |
| Height | 270 mm | 293.4 mm |
| Width | 183 mm | 204 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Colours | White, Greenery | Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12″ | 13″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,840 px | 1,350 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,800 px | 2,160 px |
| Pixel density | 279 ppi | 196 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | 686 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3% | 56.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin T90A | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.49 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 910 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 667,930 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,954 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,206 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,100 mAh | 10,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | No | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -22.6 LUFS | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) | Face recognition, accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | — |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 4.2 | Android 11 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
OnePlus Pad 2vsHuawei MatePad 12 X
8.48.2
vs
Apple iPad Air 13 (2024)vsHuawei MatePad 12 X
8.28.2
vs
Blackview Mega 1vsHuawei MatePad 12 X
7.88.2
vs
Doogee T30 MaxvsHuawei MatePad 12 X
8.18.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FEvsLenovo Yoga Tab 13
7.07.5
vs
Apple iPad Pro 11 (2021)vsLenovo Yoga Tab 13
8.27.5