zh.md
Compare
MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) vs MatePad Pro 12 (2026)

Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) vs Huawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)

What MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) does better (6) and where MatePad Pro 12 (2026) wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2025MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)

9.0Score

6 advantages≈ $920

Huawei · 2026MatePad Pro 12 (2026)

9.4Score

9 advantages≈ $830

Higher score

9.7Display9.7

8.5Battery8.6

9.4Memory & storage9.1

8.2Features8.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)MatePad Pro 12 (2026)

	MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)	MatePad Pro 12 (2026)	Difference
Height	271.3 mm	264.2 mm	+7.1 mm
Width	182.5 mm	172.9 mm	+9.6 mm
Thickness	5.5 mm	4.7 mm	+0.8 mm
Weight	508 g	439 g	+69 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) better than MatePad Pro 12 (2026)?

Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Wired charging100 W vs 66 W+52%
Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 1,600 nits+25%
Ultra-wide cameraYes · MatePad Pro 12 (2026): No
Max video4K vs 1080p
Charged in 30 min64% vs 57%+12%

Why is MatePad Pro 12 (2026) better than MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)?

Battery capacity10,100 mAh vs 10,400 mAh+3%
Weight508 g vs 439 g+16%
Pixel density275 ppi vs 296 ppi+8%
Front camera8 MP vs 12 MP+50%
Thickness5.5 mm vs 4.7 mm+17%
Bluetooth5.2 vs 6+15%
Resolution (long side)2,800 px vs 3,036 px+8%
Screen-to-body ratio89% vs 95.6%+7%
Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 1,952 px+6%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)≈ $9209.0	Huawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)≈ $8309.4
Design
Weight	508 g	439 g
Thickness	5.5 mm	4.7 mm
Height	271.3 mm	264.2 mm
Width	182.5 mm	172.9 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Ingress protection	—	IP42
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx2
Colours	Black, Green, White, Purple	Black, Silver, White, Blue, Gold
Display
Screen size	12.2″	12.2″
Panel	Double-layer OLED	OLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (short side)	1,840 px	1,952 px
Resolution (long side)	2,800 px	3,036 px
Pixel density	275 ppi	296 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	2,000 nits	1,600 nits
Measured brightness	1,045 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	89%	95.6%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin T92A	Kirin T93 / Kirin T93A
Chip maker	Kirin	Kirin
Process	7 nm	—
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	—
GPU	Maleoon 920	—
AnTuTu score	1,062,643	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,157	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	1,389	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Memory card slot	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,100 mAh	10,400 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	11.4 h	—
Wired charging	100 W	66 W
Charged in 30 min	64%	57%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.2	6
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.1
USB version	3.1	3.1
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Satellite messaging	Yes	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-22.8 LUFS	—
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	Side / power button
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera	50 MP	50 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Front camera	8 MP	12 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	HarmonyOS 4.3	HarmonyOS 6.1
Platform	HarmonyOS	HarmonyOS
EU label
Energy class	—	G
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	87 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	E