zh.md
Compare
MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) vs Galaxy Tab S9+

Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+

What MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) does better (14) and where Galaxy Tab S9+ wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2025MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)

9.0Score

14 advantages≈ $920

Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab S9+

9.2Score

10 advantages≈ $1,100

Higher score

9.7Display8.8

7.4Performance8.5

8.5Battery8.4

9.4Memory & storage9.2

8.2Features9.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)Galaxy Tab S9+

	MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)	Galaxy Tab S9+	Difference
Height	271.3 mm	285.4 mm	−14.1 mm
Width	182.5 mm	185.4 mm	−2.9 mm
Thickness	5.5 mm	5.7 mm	−0.2 mm
Weight	508 g	586 g	−78 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) better than Galaxy Tab S9+?

Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 600 nits3.3×
Wired charging100 W vs 45 W2.2×
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Measured brightness1,045 nits vs 550 nits+90%
RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Rear camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
Weight508 g vs 586 g+15%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Charged in 30 min64% vs 38%+68%
Pixel density275 ppi vs 266 ppi+3%
Screen-to-body ratio89% vs 84.3%+6%

Why is Galaxy Tab S9+ better than MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)?

AnTuTu score1,062,643 vs 1,750,937+65%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,389 vs 3,8902.8×
Cellular (LTE)No · MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025): Yes
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,157 vs 5,600+35%
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.36 GHz+40%
Memory card slotNo · MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025): Yes
eSIMNo · MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025): Yes
Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
Front camera8 MP vs 12 MP+50%
USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)≈ $9209.0	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+≈ $1,1009.2
Design
Weight	508 g	586 g
Thickness	5.5 mm	5.7 mm
Height	271.3 mm	285.4 mm
Width	182.5 mm	185.4 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Ingress protection	—	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass
Colours	Black, Green, White, Purple	Beige, Graphite
Display
Screen size	12.2″	12.4″
Panel	Double-layer OLED	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (short side)	1,840 px	1,752 px
Resolution (long side)	2,800 px	2,800 px
Pixel density	275 ppi	266 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	2,000 nits	600 nits
Measured brightness	1,045 nits	550 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89%	84.3%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin T92A	Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	7 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	3.36 GHz
GPU	Maleoon 920	Adreno 740
AnTuTu score	1,062,643	1,750,937
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,157	5,600
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	1,389	3,890
Memory
RAM	16 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	10,100 mAh	10,090 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	11.4 h	—
Wired charging	100 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	64%	38%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	Yes
5G	—	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	No	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.2	5.3
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.1	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	—	Yes
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Satellite messaging	Yes	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-22.8 LUFS	—
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera	50 MP	13 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/2
Rear cameras	2	2
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Front camera	8 MP	12 MP
4K front-camera video	No	Yes
Software
OS at launch	HarmonyOS 4.3	Android 13
Platform	HarmonyOS	Android
Interface	—	One UI 6
Major OS updates promised	—	4