zh.md
Compare
MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) vs iQOO Pad Ultra

Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) vs Vivo iQOO Pad Ultra

What MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) does better (9) and where iQOO Pad Ultra wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2025MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)

9.0Score

9 advantages≈ $920

Vivo · 2026iQOO Pad Ultra

9.4Score

10 advantages≈ $930

Higher score

9.7Display9.2

7.4Performance9.8

8.5Battery7.9

9.4Memory & storage9.4

8.2Features7.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)iQOO Pad Ultra

	MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)	iQOO Pad Ultra	Difference
Height	271.3 mm	197.4 mm	+73.9 mm
Width	182.5 mm	126.3 mm	+56.2 mm
Thickness	5.5 mm	5.7 mm	−0.2 mm
Weight	508 g	298 g	+210 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) better than iQOO Pad Ultra?

Screen size12.2″ vs 8.8″+39%
Battery capacity10,100 mAh vs 9,020 mAh+12%
Wired charging100 W vs 66 W+52%
Rear camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
GPSYes · iQOO Pad Ultra: No
Ultra-wide cameraYes · iQOO Pad Ultra: No
Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 1,440 px+28%
Resolution (long side)2,800 px vs 2,304 px+22%
Thickness5.5 mm vs 5.7 mm+4%

Why is iQOO Pad Ultra better than MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)?

AnTuTu score1,062,643 vs 4,518,4034.3×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,157 vs 11,7032.8×
Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 4,500 nits2.2×
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 5.01 GHz2.1×
Weight508 g vs 298 g+70%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 165 Hz+15%
Process7 nm vs 2 nm3.5×
Pixel density275 ppi vs 309 ppi+12%
Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)≈ $9209.0	Vivo iQOO Pad Ultra≈ $9309.4
Design
Weight	508 g	298 g
Thickness	5.5 mm	5.7 mm
Height	271.3 mm	197.4 mm
Width	182.5 mm	126.3 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Colours	Black, Green, White, Purple	Black, Silver
Display
Screen size	12.2″	8.8″
Panel	Double-layer OLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (short side)	1,840 px	1,440 px
Resolution (long side)	2,800 px	2,304 px
Pixel density	275 ppi	309 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	165 Hz
Peak brightness	2,000 nits	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	1,045 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	89%	90.1%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin T92A	Qualcomm SM8975 Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	7 nm	2 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	5.01 GHz
GPU	Maleoon 920	Adreno 850
AnTuTu score	1,062,643	4,518,403
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,157	11,703
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	1,389	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,100 mAh	9,020 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Si/C
Active use (test)	11.4 h	—
Wired charging	100 W	66 W
Charged in 30 min	64%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	No
5G	—	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2
USB version	3.1	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	—	Yes
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Satellite messaging	Yes	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	—
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-22.8 LUFS	—
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera	50 MP	13 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	—
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Front camera	8 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	HarmonyOS 4.3	Android 17
Platform	HarmonyOS	Android
Interface	—	OriginOS 7 HD