zh.md
Compare
MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) vs Pad 7 Ultra

Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) vs Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra

What MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) does better (5) and where Pad 7 Ultra wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2025MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)

9.0Score

5 advantages≈ $920

Xiaomi · 2025Pad 7 Ultra

9.7Score

15 advantages≈ $760

Higher score

9.7Display9.7

7.4Performance9.7

8.5Battery9.7

9.4Memory & storage9.4

8.2Features8.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)Pad 7 Ultra

	MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)	Pad 7 Ultra	Difference
Height	271.3 mm	305.8 mm	−34.5 mm
Width	182.5 mm	207.5 mm	−25 mm
Thickness	5.5 mm	5.1 mm	+0.4 mm
Weight	508 g	609 g	−101 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) better than Pad 7 Ultra?

Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 1,600 nits+25%
GPSYes · Pad 7 Ultra: No
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pad 7 Ultra: No
Weight508 g vs 609 g+20%

Why is Pad 7 Ultra better than MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)?

AnTuTu score1,062,643 vs 2,963,0522.8×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,157 vs 9,1912.2×
Battery capacity10,100 mAh vs 12,000 mAh+19%
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz+54%
Screen size12.2″ vs 14″+15%
Front camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
Process7 nm vs 3 nm2.3×
Wired charging100 W vs 120 W+20%
CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 2,136 px+16%
Resolution (long side)2,800 px vs 3,200 px+14%
Thickness5.5 mm vs 5.1 mm+8%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)≈ $9209.0	Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra≈ $7609.7
Design
Weight	508 g	609 g
Thickness	5.5 mm	5.1 mm
Height	271.3 mm	305.8 mm
Width	182.5 mm	207.5 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Black, Green, White, Purple	Gray, Blue
Display
Screen size	12.2″	14″
Panel	Double-layer OLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (short side)	1,840 px	2,136 px
Resolution (long side)	2,800 px	3,200 px
Pixel density	275 ppi	275 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	2,000 nits	1,600 nits
Measured brightness	1,045 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	89%	92%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin T92A	Xring O1
Chip maker	Kirin	Xring
Process	7 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	3.7 GHz
GPU	Maleoon 920	Immortalis-G925 MP16
AnTuTu score	1,062,643	2,963,052
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,157	9,191
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	1,389	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,100 mAh	12,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	11.4 h	—
Wired charging	100 W	120 W
Charged in 30 min	64%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	No
5G	—	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2
USB version	3.1	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	—	Yes
NFC	No	Yes
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Satellite messaging	Yes	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-22.8 LUFS	—
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	Side / power button
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera	50 MP	50 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Front camera	8 MP	32 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	HarmonyOS 4.3	Android 15
Platform	HarmonyOS	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS 2