zh.md
Compare
MatePad Pro 12 (2026) vs Yoga Tab Plus

Huawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026) vs Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus

What MatePad Pro 12 (2026) does better (12) and where Yoga Tab Plus wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2026MatePad Pro 12 (2026)

9.4Score

12 advantages≈ $830

Higher score

Lenovo · 2025Yoga Tab Plus

9.1Score

6 advantages≈ $830

9.7Display8.9

8.6Battery8.8

9.1Memory & storage9.1

8.8Features7.1

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad Pro 12 (2026)Yoga Tab Plus

	MatePad Pro 12 (2026)	Yoga Tab Plus	Difference
Height	264.2 mm	290.9 mm	−26.7 mm
Width	172.9 mm	188.3 mm	−15.4 mm
Thickness	4.7 mm	8.5 mm	−3.8 mm
Weight	439 g	640 g	−201 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Pro 12 (2026) better than Yoga Tab Plus?

OLED panelYes · Yoga Tab Plus: No
Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 900 nits+78%
Wired charging66 W vs 45 W+47%
Weight439 g vs 640 g+46%
Rear camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
GPSYes · Yoga Tab Plus: No
Thickness4.7 mm vs 8.5 mm+81%
Pixel density296 ppi vs 273 ppi+8%
Screen-to-body ratio95.6% vs 85.4%+12%
Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
Resolution (short side)1,952 px vs 1,840 px+6%
Resolution (long side)3,036 px vs 2,944 px+3%

Why is Yoga Tab Plus better than MatePad Pro 12 (2026)?

Screen size12.2″ vs 12.7″+4%
Energy classG vs F
Repairability classC vs A
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx3+50%
Endurance per cycle87 h vs 123 h+42%
Front camera12 MP vs 13 MP+8%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)≈ $8309.4	Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus≈ $8309.1
Design
Weight	439 g	640 g
Thickness	4.7 mm	8.5 mm
Height	264.2 mm	290.9 mm
Width	172.9 mm	188.3 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Aluminium	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP42	IP53
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	IPx3
Colours	Black, Silver, White, Blue, Gold	Seashell, Tidal teal
Display
Screen size	12.2″	12.7″
Panel	OLED	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (short side)	1,952 px	1,840 px
Resolution (long side)	3,036 px	2,944 px
Pixel density	296 ppi	273 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	1,600 nits	900 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	95.6%	85.4%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin T93 / Kirin T93A	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	—	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	—	3.3 GHz
GPU	—	Adreno 750
AnTuTu score	—	2,333,285
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,888
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,400 mAh	10,200 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Wired charging	66 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	57%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	No
5G	—	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	6	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.1
USB version	3.1	3.1
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	—	Yes
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	Side / power button
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera	50 MP	13 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	—
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Front camera	12 MP	13 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	HarmonyOS 6.1	Android 14
Platform	HarmonyOS	Android
Major OS updates promised	—	3
EU label
Energy class	G	F
Battery charge cycles	1,000	1,000
Endurance per cycle	87 h	123 h
Repairability class	C	A
Drop resistance class	E	E