zh.md
Compare
MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) vs nubia RedMagic Nova

Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) vs ZTE nubia RedMagic Nova

What MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) does better (9) and where nubia RedMagic Nova wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2024MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)

9.5Score

9 advantages≈ $730

Higher score

ZTE · 2024nubia RedMagic Nova

8.9Score

6 advantages≈ $540

9.7Display7.8

9.2Battery7.7

9.4Memory & storage9.6

9.2Features8.1

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)nubia RedMagic Nova

	MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)	nubia RedMagic Nova	Difference
Height	289.1 mm	253.3 mm	+35.8 mm
Width	196.1 mm	164.6 mm	+31.5 mm
Thickness	5.5 mm	7.3 mm	−1.8 mm
Weight	580 g	530 g	+50 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) better than nubia RedMagic Nova?

OLED panelYes · nubia RedMagic Nova: No
Cellular (LTE)Yes · nubia RedMagic Nova: No
Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 550 nits+82%
Screen size13.2″ vs 10.9″+21%
GPSYes · nubia RedMagic Nova: No
Ultra-wide cameraYes · nubia RedMagic Nova: No
Thickness5.5 mm vs 7.3 mm+33%
Screen-to-body ratio91.5% vs 82.6%+11%
Resolution (short side)1,920 px vs 1,800 px+7%

Why is nubia RedMagic Nova better than MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)?

RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
Wired charging100 W vs 120 W+20%
Pixel density262 ppi vs 312 ppi+19%
Weight580 g vs 530 g+9%
Front camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)≈ $7309.5	ZTE nubia RedMagic Nova≈ $5408.9
Design
Weight	580 g	530 g
Thickness	5.5 mm	7.3 mm
Height	289.1 mm	253.3 mm
Width	196.1 mm	164.6 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	Fibre	Aluminium
Colours	Black, White, Gold	Cyclone, Snowfall, Midnight
Display
Screen size	13.2″	10.9″
Panel	OLED	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (short side)	1,920 px	1,800 px
Resolution (long side)	2,880 px	2,880 px
Pixel density	262 ppi	312 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	1,000 nits	550 nits
Measured brightness	—	517 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	91.5%	82.6%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Kirin T92	Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	—	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	—	3.4 GHz
GPU	—	Adreno 750
AnTuTu score	—	2,128,514
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	7,206
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	5,399
Memory
RAM	16 GB	24 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,100 mAh	10,100 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	10.8 h
Wired charging	100 W	120 W
Charged in 30 min	—	55%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	—	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2
USB version	3.1	3.1
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	Yes
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	—
Satellite messaging	Yes	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	—
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-23.9 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	Side / power button
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only)	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera	50 MP	50 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Front camera	16 MP	20 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Harmony OS 4.3	Android 14
Platform	Other (Windows, …)	Android
Interface	—	REDMAGIC Space 9.5