vs
2.4Display2.0
3.4Performance3.1
2.4Battery2.1
2.2Memory & storage2.1
2.4Features2.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad T8Tab M7 (3rd Gen)
| MatePad T8 | Tab M7 (3rd Gen) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 199.7 mm | 176.2 mm | +23.5 mm |
| Width | 121.1 mm | 102.3 mm | +18.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 310 g | 237 g | +73 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad T8 better than Tab M7 (3rd Gen)?
- Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 3,750 mAh+36%
- RAM3 GB vs 2 GB+50%
- Screen size8″ vs 7″+14%
- Rear camera5 MP vs 2 MP2.5×
- Max video1080p vs 720p
- Pixel density189 ppi vs 170 ppi+11%
- Resolution (short side)800 px vs 600 px+33%
- Resolution (long side)1,280 px vs 1,024 px+25%
Why is Tab M7 (3rd Gen) better than MatePad T8?
- Weight310 g vs 237 g+31%
- Storage (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 8.3 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 310 g | 237 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 199.7 mm | 176.2 mm |
| Width | 121.1 mm | 102.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Colours | Deepsea Blue | Iron Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TDDI IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | 600 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,280 px | 1,024 px |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 170 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 350 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 76.7% | 76.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8768 | Mediatek MT8166 - Wi-Fi version |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 3 GB | 2 GB |
| Storage (max) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 3,750 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 5 MP | 2 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/2.2 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 720p |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 10 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020)vsHuawei MatePad T8
3.93.8
vs
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus (2020)vsHuawei MatePad T8
4.03.8
vs
Honor Pad X6vsHuawei MatePad T8
4.03.8
vs
Allview Viva 803GvsHuawei MatePad T8
3.53.8
vs
Allview Viva 1003GvsHuawei MatePad T8
3.63.8
vs
Allview Viva 1003G LitevsHuawei MatePad T8
3.63.8


