vs
2.4Display2.0
3.4Performance2.8
2.4Battery3.0
2.2Memory & storage2.8
2.4Features3.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad T8Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
| MatePad T8 | Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 199.7 mm | 212.5 mm | −12.8 mm |
| Width | 121.1 mm | 124.7 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 310 g | 366 g | −56 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad T8 better than Galaxy Tab A7 Lite?
- Weight310 g vs 366 g+18%
- Pixel density189 ppi vs 179 ppi+6%
Why is Galaxy Tab A7 Lite better than MatePad T8?
- Storage (max)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · MatePad T8: Yes
- RAM3 GB vs 4 GB+33%
- Screen size8″ vs 8.7″+9%
- Storage (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+15%
- Rear camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 8 mm+7%
- Screen-to-body ratio76.7% vs 81.1%+6%
- Resolution (long side)1,280 px vs 1,340 px+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 310 g | 366 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 199.7 mm | 212.5 mm |
| Width | 121.1 mm | 124.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Colours | Deepsea Blue | Gray, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 8.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,280 px | 1,340 px |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 179 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 350 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 329 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 76.7% | 81.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8768 | Mediatek MT8768T Helio P22T |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 156,818 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/2.2 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 10 | One UI 6.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020)vsHuawei MatePad T8
3.93.8
vs
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus (2020)vsHuawei MatePad T8
4.03.8
vs
Honor Pad X6vsHuawei MatePad T8
4.03.8
vs
Allview Viva 803GvsHuawei MatePad T8
3.53.8
vs
Allview Viva 1003GvsHuawei MatePad T8
3.63.8
vs
Allview Viva 1003G LitevsHuawei MatePad T8
3.63.8


