vs
4.9Display6.3
8.0Memory & storage6.1
Why is W90 better than Megapad Pro?
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight534 g vs 547 g+2%
Why is Megapad Pro better than W90?
- Screen size11″ vs 12″+9%
- Peak brightness380 nits vs 450 nits+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 534 g | 547 g |
| Ingress protection | IP44 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | — | Sky Gray, Aurora Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 12″ |
| Panel | — | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 2,000 px |
| Pixel density | — | 194 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 380 nits | 450 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger | — |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 10,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | — | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| NFC | — | No |
| GPS | — | No |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | — | 13 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| 4K front-camera video | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 15 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 125 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
