Why is T20 better than W90?
- Weight412 g vs 534 g+30%
Why is W90 better than T20?
- Screen size10.1″ vs 11″+9%
- Endurance per cycle77 h vs 125 h+62%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 412 g | 534 g |
| Height | 8 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP44 | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 11″ |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Peak brightness | — | 380 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger | Unisoc Tiger |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | D |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 77 h | 125 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | B | B |
