How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. W90 vs Pad SE

Kingrid W90 vs Vivo Pad SE

What W90 does better (2) and where Pad SE wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Kingrid W90
Kingrid · 2025W90
6.9Score
2 advantages≈ $120
Higher score
vs
Vivo Pad SE
Vivo · 2025Pad SE
6.5Score
2 advantages≈ $130
4.9Display7.6
8.0Memory & storage5.6

Why is W90 better than Pad SE?

  1. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  2. Weight534 g vs 559 g+5%

Why is Pad SE better than W90?

  1. Peak brightness380 nits vs 600 nits+58%
  2. Screen size11″ vs 12.3″+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Kingrid W90Kingrid W90≈ $1206.9
Vivo Pad SEVivo Pad SE≈ $1306.5
Design
Weight534 g559 g
Thickness—6.8 mm
Height—277.1 mm
Width—185.6 mm
Ingress protectionIP44—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
Colours—Gray, Blue, Titanium
Display
Screen size11″12.3″
Panel—IPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)—1,600 px
Resolution (long side)—2,464 px
Pixel density—239 ppi
Refresh rate—90 Hz
Peak brightness380 nits600 nits
Screen-to-body ratio—86.7%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc TigerQualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
Chip makerUnisocQualcomm
Process—4 nm
CPU cores—8
CPU frequency—2.2 GHz
GPU—Adreno 613
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage type—UFS 3.1
Memory card slot—No
Battery
Battery capacity—8,500 mAh
Wired charging—15 W
Wireless charging—No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
eSIM—No
Dual SIM—No
Wi-Fi standard—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—4.2
USB—USB Type-C 2.0
USB version—2
NFC—No
GPS—No
Features
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack—No
Sensors—Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera—5 MP
Rear cameras—1
Ultra-wide camera—No
Optical stabilisation—No
Front camera—5 MP
4K front-camera video—No
Software
OS at launch—Android 15
Platform—Android
Interface—OriginOS 5 HD
EU label
Energy classD—
Battery charge cycles800—
Endurance per cycle125 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classB—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare