Why is Tab K9 better than Tab 80?
- Weight320 g vs 610 g+91%
- Screen size8.7″ vs 8″+9%
- Energy classD vs F
- Repairability classA vs B
- Endurance per cycle80 h vs 60 h+33%
- Battery charge cycles1,000 vs 800+25%
Why is Tab 80 better than Tab K9?
Tab 80 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 320 g | 610 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | — |
| Height | 9 mm | 12 mm |
| Width | 124.8 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Luna Grey, Seafoam Green | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.7″ | 8″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,340 px | — |
| Pixel density | 179 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.6% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio | Allwinner |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Allwinner |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | Zen UI 16 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | F |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 80 h | 60 h |
| Repairability class | A | B |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
