Why is Tab 210 better than Tab 80?
- Screen size10.1″ vs 8″+26%
- Weight500 g vs 610 g+22%
- Battery charge cycles900 vs 800+12%
Why is Tab 80 better than Tab 210?
- Endurance per cycle52 h vs 60 h+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 500 g | 610 g |
| Thickness | 10 mm | — |
| Height | 10 mm | 12 mm |
| Width | 172 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 8″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,280 px | — |
| Pixel density | 149 ppi | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 70.8% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Allwinner A537 | Allwinner |
| Chip maker | — | Allwinner |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC1 @750 MHz | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | F | F |
| Battery charge cycles | 900 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 52 h | 60 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
