vs
6.8Display3.3
5.0Performance4.3
4.3Battery3.3
5.2Memory & storage4.6
5.9Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto Pad (2026)Black Shark Pad SE
| Moto Pad (2026) | Black Shark Pad SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 254.6 mm | 255 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Width | 166.2 mm | 167 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 7.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 480 g | 478 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto Pad (2026) better than Black Shark Pad SE?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Wired charging20 W vs 10 W2×
- 5GYes · Black Shark Pad SE: No
- Pixel density274 ppi vs 149 ppi+84%
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Battery capacity7,040 mAh vs 6,600 mAh+7%
- Screen size11″ vs 10.1″+9%
- Resolution (short side)1,600 px vs 800 px2×
- Resolution (long side)2,560 px vs 1,280 px2×
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- GPSYes · Black Shark Pad SE: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Black Shark Pad SE: No
Why is Black Shark Pad SE better than Moto Pad (2026)?
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 480 g | 478 g |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 254.6 mm | 255 mm |
| Width | 166.2 mm | 167 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Aluminium | — |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Colours | Pantone Bronze Green | Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,560 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 274 ppi | 149 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 392 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 69.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Mediatek Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 527,271 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,981 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,040 mAh | 6,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 10 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
HANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7BvsMotorola Moto Pad (2026)
vs
Jumper Z3vsMotorola Moto Pad (2026)
vs
Xoro MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2vsMotorola Moto Pad (2026)
5.86.1
vs
Motorola Moto Pad (2026)vsTCL Tab A1 NxtPaper
6.16.1
vs
TCL Tab A1vsMotorola Moto Pad (2026)
6.16.1
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SEvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
4.95.4