vs
6.8Display6.9
5.0Performance4.6
4.3Battery4.5
5.2Memory & storage3.8
5.9Features3.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto Pad (2026)Poco Pad C1
| Moto Pad (2026) | Poco Pad C1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 254.6 mm | 226.5 mm | +28.1 mm |
| Width | 166.2 mm | 148 mm | +18.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 7.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 480 g | 406 g | +74 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto Pad (2026) better than Poco Pad C1?
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · Poco Pad C1: No
- 5GYes · Poco Pad C1: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,981 vs 1,558+27%
- AnTuTu score527,271 vs 511,632+3%
- Screen size11″ vs 9.7″+13%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- GPSYes · Poco Pad C1: No
- Wired charging20 W vs 18 W+11%
- Pixel density274 ppi vs 268 ppi+2%
- Resolution (short side)1,600 px vs 1,280 px+25%
- Resolution (long side)2,560 px vs 2,048 px+25%
Why is Poco Pad C1 better than Moto Pad (2026)?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity7,040 mAh vs 7,600 mAh+8%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz+21%
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 600 nits+20%
- Weight480 g vs 406 g+18%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.9% vs 87.9%+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 480 g | 406 g |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 254.6 mm | 226.5 mm |
| Width | 166.2 mm | 148 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Colours | Pantone Bronze Green | Gray, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 9.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | 1,280 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,560 px | 2,048 px |
| Pixel density | 274 ppi | 268 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 392 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 87.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 527,271 | 511,632 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,981 | 1,558 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,040 mAh | 7,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 3 |
Related comparisons
vs
HANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7BvsMotorola Moto Pad (2026)
vs
Jumper Z3vsMotorola Moto Pad (2026)
vs
Xoro MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2vsMotorola Moto Pad (2026)
5.86.1
vs
Motorola Moto Pad (2026)vsTCL Tab A1 NxtPaper
6.16.1
vs
TCL Tab A1vsMotorola Moto Pad (2026)
6.16.1
vs
Lenovo IdeaTab Pro G2vsXiaomi Poco Pad C1