vs
6.8Display2.2
4.9Performance4.9
4.3Battery2.3
5.2Memory & storage5.2
5.9Features3.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto Pad (2026)Z-Pad SE
| Moto Pad (2026) | Z-Pad SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 254.6 mm | 240.5 mm | +14.1 mm |
| Width | 166.2 mm | 158.9 mm | +7.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 8.8 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Weight | 480 g | 488 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto Pad (2026) better than Z-Pad SE?
- Battery capacity7,040 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+41%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Wired charging20 W vs 10 W2×
- Pixel density274 ppi vs 149 ppi+84%
- Front camera5 MP vs 2 MP2.5×
- Screen size11″ vs 10.1″+9%
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 350 nits+43%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+33%
- Resolution (short side)1,600 px vs 800 px2×
- Resolution (long side)2,560 px vs 1,280 px2×
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Rear camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
Why is Z-Pad SE better than Moto Pad (2026)?
Z-Pad SE has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 480 g | 488 g |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 254.6 mm | 240.5 mm |
| Width | 166.2 mm | 158.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Colours | Pantone Bronze Green | Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,560 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 274 ppi | 149 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 350 nits |
| Measured brightness | 392 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 77.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 527,271 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,981 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,040 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 10 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 2 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
HANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7BvsMotorola Moto Pad (2026)
vs
Xoro MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2vsMotorola Moto Pad (2026)
5.86.1
vs
Motorola Moto Pad (2026)vsAcer Iconia A16 A16-21
vs
Motorola Moto Pad (2026)vsTCL Tab A1 NxtPaper
6.16.0
vs
TCL Tab A1vsMotorola Moto Pad (2026)
6.16.1
vs
Lenovo IdeaTab Pro G2vsZEED Z-Pad SE